For the next installment in our profiles of this year’s June
in Buffalo composition faculty, we introduce the work of David Dzubay. Dzubay’s
Nine Fragments will be performed by Dal Niente, Kukulkan III by Signal, and Siren
Song by the Buffalo Philharmonic Orchestra. This is not Dzubay’s
first contact with UB and its network: he attended June in Buffalo as a student
in 1997 (during this festival, he also functioned as guest conductor), and one
of his principal composition teachers was Lukas Foss, professor of composition
at UB during the 1960s.
Dzubay’s music has received a formidable amount of
institutional recognition across the world. His works have been performed by
the symphony orchestras of Aspen, Atlanta,
Baltimore, Cincinnati, Detroit, Louisville, Memphis, Minnesota, St. Louis and
Vancouver; the American Composers Orchestra, National Symphonies of Ireland and
Mexico, New World Symphony, and conductors including James DePreist, Eiji Oue,
JoAnn Falletta, Keith Lockhart and David Zinman. He has recently received
numerous prestigious honors, including a Sackler Prize, two Fromm Commissions, and
an Arts and Letters Award from the American Academy of Arts and Letters;
Guggenheim, Bogliasco, MacDowell, Yaddo, Copland House and Djerassi fellowships;
awards from the NEA (twice), BMI (twice), ASCAP (thrice), Meet the Composer, the
American Music Center, and the Tanglewood Music Center. Currently Professor of
Music at Indiana University Jacobs School of Music and composer in residence at
the Brevard Music Center, he previously taught at the University of North
Texas. Also active as a conductor, he is Director of the New Music Ensemble at
Indiana University, and has conducted at the Tanglewood, Aspen, and June in
Buffalo Festivals.
Dzubay’s music has been praised for its fresh, distinctive
voice, which he has cultivated within listening parameters familiar to
classical music audiences, those of 19th century Western art music.
It is no easy task to find new musical possibilities within this extremely
well-worn musical space; below, I explore three strategies the composer uses to
“make it new” while not departing radically from certain conventions.
John von
Rhein, music critic of the Chicago Tribute, writes that Dzubay’s work is “beautifully conceived for the instruments,
the music bears a distinctive stamp,” while Michael Anthony of the Minneapolis
Star Tribune writes that “he
also knows how to translate his imaginings into bright, unusual orchestral
sound.” The opening of Siren Song exemplifies some of Dzubay’s orchestrational
strategies in action: emphasis on dull or bright instrumental tessituras, ambiguities
between harmony and timbre, and between pitched and unpitched instruments, and
a stratified polyphonic depth of field, all indicating awareness of innovative
20th century orchestral works.
If the music’s kaleidoscope of vivid colors opens up
possibilities within a compositional practice centering familiar listening
parameters like dramaturgy and harmony, its stylistic and historical diversity
serves a similar purpose. Dzubay composed certain pieces as parodies (“in the respectful sense,” writes
the composer) of works by Josquin des Prez and Perotin—a framework that
thematizes unbridgeable historical difference, cultivating resistance to composing and listening habits. More
broadly, as Matthew Guerrerri of the Boston Globe writes, Dzubay’s music
frequently draws on a wide stylistic palette, “[gathering] miscellaneous styles under a
buzzing, rustling, shimmering sonic umbrella.” The range of reference is wide: Nine
Fragments, to be performed at June in Buffalo, was inspired by the music and
playing of composer/oboist Heinz Holliger, one of the most radical musicians of
the late 1960s and eary 1970s, while other works, as discussed above, take
medieval music as their point of departure.
Parallel to invoking other music, Dzubay’s works are frequently
programmatic, invoking extra-musical phenomena through titles, program notes,
and use of referential topoi. These references function to particularize and
comment upon received musical conventions. For instance, at 5:19 in Siren Song, the regular drum strokes refer to the genre of
the march, perhaps a funeral march. However, certain details—such as the anguished,
restless lyricism of the upper-voice melody, as well as the texture’s
increasing metric disintegration—contradict the genre’s ramified conventions. The
piece’s use of the march defamiliarizes the genre’s conventions; while the
genre’s presence in the work lends it dimensionality, engaging in conversation
with a familiar, multi-faceted cultural object.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.